Skip to content

370 Jammu Kashmir

Jammu and Kashmir is a region of immense strategic, political, and cultural significance for India. It is also a region of complex and contested legal landscape, which has undergone several changes in the recent past. The abrogation of Article 370 and the bifurcation of the erstwhile state into two union territories in 2019 have sparked debates and controversies over the constitutional, legal, and human rights implications of these moves. Moreover, the ongoing security challenges, the socio-economic development issues, and the aspirations of the people of Jammu and Kashmir also pose various legal questions and challenges. In this blog, we will provide an introduction to the legal landscape in Jammu and Kashmir, covering its historical background, its key concepts and definitions, its laws and legal points, and its common concerns and solutions. We will also share a real-life example of how our legal services can help you navigate the legal complexities in Jammu and Kashmir.

Historical Background

The legal landscape in Jammu and Kashmir has its roots in the history of the region, which was once a princely state under the British rule. The princely state of Jammu and Kashmir was created in 1846 under the Treaty of Amritsar signed between the East India Company and Maharaja Gulab Singh, who became the founder of the Dogra dynasty. The princely state comprised of Jammu, Kashmir Valley, Ladakh, Gilgit, Baltistan, and other territories. The princely state enjoyed a considerable degree of autonomy under the British paramountcy, which allowed it to have its own constitution, flag, and laws.

After the partition of India in 1947, the princely states were given the option to accede to either India or Pakistan or remain independent. The ruler of Jammu and Kashmir, Maharaja Hari Singh, initially decided to remain independent and signed a standstill agreement with both India and Pakistan. However, soon after, Pakistan-backed tribal invaders attacked Jammu and Kashmir, prompting Maharaja Hari Singh to seek India’s help. India agreed to help on the condition that Maharaja Hari Singh would sign an Instrument of Accession with India. Maharaja Hari Singh signed the Instrument of Accession on October 26, 1947, thereby acceding Jammu and Kashmir to India. The Instrument of Accession gave India control over three subjects: defence, foreign affairs, and communications. The rest of the subjects were left to the discretion of the state government.

The accession of Jammu and Kashmir to India was followed by a war between India and Pakistan over the region. India took the matter to the United Nations Security Council (UNSC), which passed several resolutions calling for a plebiscite to determine the will of the people of Jammu and Kashmir. However, the plebiscite never took place due to various reasons, including Pakistan’s refusal to withdraw its troops from the occupied territory as required by the UNSC resolutions. The war ended with a ceasefire in 1949, which resulted in a de facto division of Jammu and Kashmir along a line called the Line of Control (LoC).

In 1950, India adopted its Constitution, which included Article 370 as a temporary provision to grant special status to Jammu and Kashmir. Article 370 gave Jammu and Kashmir its own constitution, flag, and autonomy over all subjects except those specified in the Instrument of Accession. Article 370 also required the concurrence of the state government for applying any provision of the Indian Constitution to Jammu and Kashmir. Moreover, Article 370 also included Article 35A, which empowered the state legislature to define the permanent residents of Jammu and Kashmir and grant them special rights and privileges.

In 1954, the President of India issued the Constitution (Application to Jammu and Kashmir) Order, 19541, which extended some provisions of the Indian Constitution to Jammu and Kashmir with the concurrence of the state government. The Order also specified that the head of the state would be called the Governor instead of the Maharaja, and that the state legislature would be elected by universal adult suffrage. The Order also declared that Jammu and Kashmir was an integral part of India.

In 1956, Jammu and Kashmir adopted its own Constitution, which reaffirmed its accession to India and its special status under Article 370. The Constitution also divided the state into three regions: Jammu, Kashmir, and Ladakh. The Constitution also provided for a bicameral legislature, a High Court, and a Governor as the head of the state.

In 1957, India and Pakistan signed the Karachi Agreement, which formalized the LoC as the de facto border between the two countries. However, both countries continued to claim sovereignty over the entire region of Jammu and Kashmir.

In 1962, India and China fought a war over the disputed border in Ladakh, which resulted in China occupying some parts of Ladakh. The war ended with a ceasefire agreement, which established a line called the Line of Actual Control (LAC) as the de facto border between India and China.

In 1965 and 1971, India and Pakistan fought two more wars over Jammu and Kashmir, which did not alter the status quo of the LoC. In 1972, India and Pakistan signed the Simla Agreement, which reaffirmed their commitment to respect the LoC as the basis for resolving their disputes peacefully.

In 1987, Jammu and Kashmir witnessed a surge in militancy and violence, which was fueled by allegations of rigged elections, human rights violations, and external support from Pakistan. The militancy also gave rise to separatist movements and demands for independence or merger with Pakistan.

In 1990, India imposed President’s rule in Jammu and Kashmir, suspending the state government and imposing central rule. The state also witnessed a mass exodus of Kashmiri Pandits, who were targeted by militants.

In 1994, India passed a resolution in Parliament declaring that Jammu and Kashmir was an integral part of India and that Pakistan should vacate its occupied territory.

In 1999, India and Pakistan fought a limited war in Kargil, which was triggered by Pakistan’s infiltration of its troops across the LoC. The war ended with India regaining control of its territory and Pakistan withdrawing its forces.

In 2002, India and Pakistan initiated a peace process to resolve their outstanding issues, including Jammu and Kashmir. The peace process included several confidence-building measures, such as a ceasefire along the LoC, bus and train services across the border, people-to-people contacts, etc.

In 2005, India and Pakistan agreed on a set of principles to guide their dialogue on Jammu and Kashmir. The principles included respecting each other’s sovereignty and territorial integrity, continuing the historical background of the legal landscape in Jammu and Kashmir:

• In 2008, Jammu and Kashmir witnessed a series of protests and violence over the issue of land transfer to the Amarnath Shrine Board, which manages the annual pilgrimage to the Hindu shrine of Amarnath. The protests reflected the religious and regional divide between the Kashmir Valley and the Jammu region.

• In 2010, Jammu and Kashmir witnessed another wave of protests and violence over the alleged human rights violations by the security forces and the killing of civilians by the police. The protests also expressed the demand for self-determination and autonomy for Jammu and Kashmir.

• In 2014, Jammu and Kashmir witnessed a historic election, which resulted in a hung assembly. The People’s

Democratic Party (PDP) and the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) formed a coalition government, which was seen as a sign of political reconciliation between the Kashmir Valley and the Jammu region.

• In 2016, Jammu and Kashmir witnessed another wave of protests and violence following the killing of a militant leader, Burhan Wani, by the security forces. The protests also escalated due to the use of pellet guns by the security forces, which caused injuries and blindness to many civilians.

• In 2018, Jammu and Kashmir witnessed a political crisis, which led to the collapse of the PDP-BJP coalition government. The state came under Governor’s rule, followed by President’s rule.

• In 2019, India abrogated Article 370 and Article 35A of its Constitution, which granted special status and privileges to Jammu and Kashmir. India also bifurcated the state into two union territories: Jammu and Kashmir, and Ladakh. These moves were met with mixed reactions from different stakeholders, ranging from support to opposition to indifference. India also imposed a lockdown and a communication blackout in Jammu and Kashmir, which affected the normal life and human rights of the people.

Key Concepts

The legal landscape in Jammu and Kashmir is based on some key concepts that define its nature and scope. These concepts are:

• Accession: Accession is the act of joining or becoming part of a larger entity. In the context of Jammu and Kashmir, accession refers to the Instrument of Accession signed by Maharaja Hari Singh in 1947, which made Jammu and Kashmir part of India.

• Article 370: Article 370 is a provision of the Indian Constitution that granted special status to Jammu and Kashmir. It gave Jammu and Kashmir its own constitution, flag, and autonomy over all subjects except those specified in the Instrument of Accession. Article 370 also required the concurrence of the state government for applying any provision of the Indian Constitution to Jammu and Kashmir. Moreover, Article 370 also included Article 35A, which empowered the state legislature to define the permanent residents of Jammu and Kashmir and grant them special rights and privileges.

Article 370 and Article 35A, which empowered the state legislature to define the permanent residents of Jammu and Kashmir and grant them special rights and privileges. Article 370 was abrogated by India in 2019, which revoked the special status and privileges of Jammu and Kashmir.

• Union Territory: Union Territory is a type of administrative division in India that is governed directly by the central government. Unlike states, union territories do not have their own legislatures or elected governments. However, some union territories have partial statehood, which allows them to have their own legislatures and elected governments. In the context of Jammu and Kashmir, union territory refers to the two new entities created by India in 2019: Jammu and Kashmir, and Ladakh. Jammu and Kashmir has partial statehood, while Ladakh does not.

• Line of Control: Line of Control is the de facto border between India and Pakistan in Jammu and Kashmir. It was established in 1949 as a result of a ceasefire agreement between the two countries. The Line of Control is not an internationally recognized boundary, but rather a military control line that is subject to frequent violations and skirmishes.

• Line of Actual Control: Line of Actual Control is the de facto border between India and China in Ladakh. It was established in 1962 as a result of a ceasefire agreement between the two countries. The Line of Actual Control is not an agreed-upon boundary, but rather a perception line that varies according to the claims and positions of both sides.

Laws

The following are the main laws that govern the legal landscape in Jammu and Kashmir:

• The Constitution of India: The Constitution of India is the supreme law of the land that defines the structure, powers, functions, and principles of the government and the rights and duties of the citizens. The Constitution of India applies to all states and union territories in India, including Jammu and Kashmir. However, some provisions of the Constitution of India were applied to Jammu and Kashmir with modifications or exceptions under Article 370. These provisions were specified in the Constitution (Application to Jammu and Kashmir) Order, 1954 and its subsequent amendments. After the abrogation of Article 370 in 2019, all provisions of the Constitution of India apply to Jammu and Kashmir without any modifications or exceptions.

• The Constitution of Jammu and Kashmir: The Constitution of Jammu and Kashmir was the state constitution that was adopted by Jammu and Kashmir in 1956 under Article 370. It reaffirmed its accession to India and its special status under Article 370. It also provided for a bicameral legislature, a High Court, and a Governor as the head of the state. The Constitution of Jammu and Kashmir was repealed by India in 2019, along with Article 370.

• The Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation Act, 2019: The Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation Act, 2019 is an act of Parliament that bifurcated the state of Jammu and Kashmir into two union territories: Jammu and Kashmir, and Ladakh. The Act also abolished the state legislature of Jammu and Kashmir and provided for a legislative assembly for the union territory of Jammu and Kashmir, and a legislative council for the union territory of Ladakh. The Act also transferred some subjects from the state list to the concurrent list, and some subjects from the concurrent list to the union list, for the union territories of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh. The Act also provided for the delimitation of the constituencies for the union territory of Jammu and Kashmir based on the 2011 census.

• The Jammu and Kashmir Civil Services (Decentralisation and Recruitment) Act, 2010: The Jammu and Kashmir Civil Services (Decentralisation and Recruitment) Act, 2010 is an act of the state legislature that defined the permanent residents of Jammu and Kashmir and granted them special rights and privileges in matters of public employment, acquisition of immovable property, settlement in the state, and scholarships. The Act also provided for reservation of seats in professional institutions for the residents of backward areas. The Act was based on Article 35A of the Indian Constitution, which empowered the state legislature to define the permanent residents of Jammu and Kashmir. The Act was abrogated by India in 2019, along with Article 35A.

• The Jammu and Kashmir Public Safety Act, 1978: The Jammu and Kashmir Public Safety Act, 1978 is an act of the state legislature that provides for preventive detention of any person for a period of up to two years without trial if he is deemed to be acting in a manner prejudicial to the security of the state or the maintenance of public order. The Act also provides for detention of any person for a period of up to one year without trial if he is deemed to be acting in a manner prejudicial to the maintenance of supplies and services essential to the community. The Act has been widely criticized for its misuse and abuse by the authorities, especially against political activists, human rights defenders, journalists, etc.

• The Armed Forces (Jammu and Kashmir) Special Powers Act, 1990: The Armed Forces (Jammu and Kashmir) Special Powers Act, 1990 is an act of Parliament that grants special powers to the armed forces

deployed in Jammu and Kashmir. The Act empowers the armed forces to fire upon or use force against any person who is acting against law and order, to arrest any person without warrant, to enter and search any premises without warrant, to destroy any arms dump or fortified position, etc. The Act also provides immunity to the armed forces from prosecution or legal action for their actions under the Act. The Act has been widely criticized for its violation of human rights and civil liberties, especially by the international community.

Legal Points

The following are some important legal points related to the legal landscape in Jammu and Kashmir:

• The legal status of Jammu and Kashmir as an integral part of India is based on the Instrument of Accession signed by Maharaja Hari Singh in 1947, which was ratified by the Constituent Assembly of Jammu and Kashmir in 1954. The Instrument of Accession is a valid and irrevocable legal document that cannot be challenged or altered by any party. The accession of Jammu and Kashmir to India is also recognized by the international community, as evident from the UN resolutions that acknowledge India’s sovereignty over Jammu and Kashmir.

• The special status of Jammu and Kashmir under Article 370 was a temporary and transitional arrangement that was meant to facilitate the integration of Jammu and Kashmir with India. Article 370 was not a permanent feature of the Indian Constitution, but rather a provisional provision that could be amended or repealed by the Parliament with the concurrence of the state government. Article 370 was not a binding contract between India and Jammu and Kashmir, but rather a constitutional mechanism that gave Jammu and Kashmir some degree of autonomy within the framework of the Indian Constitution.

• The abrogation of Article 370 and Article 35A in 2019 was a constitutional and democratic decision taken by the Parliament with the assent of the President. The abrogation was done in accordance with the provisions of Article 370 itself, which empowered the President to issue orders to modify or revoke Article 370 with the concurrence of the state government. Since Jammu and Kashmir was under President’s rule at that time, the concurrence of the state government was implied by the concurrence of the Governor, who acted as the representative of the state government. The abrogation was also done with the objective of ensuring the unity, integrity, security, and development of India and Jammu and Kashmir.

• The bifurcation of Jammu and Kashmir into two union territories in 2019 was a reorganisation and restructuring decision taken by the Parliament with the assent of the President. The bifurcation was done in accordance with the provisions of Article 3 of the Indian Constitution, which empowered the Parliament to form new states or union territories by altering the boundaries or names of existing states or union territories. The bifurcation was also done with the objective of ensuring better administration, governance, and development of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh.

Common Concerns

The following are some common concerns related to the legal landscape in Jammu and Kashmir:

How does the abrogation of Article 370 and Article 35A impact the relationship between Jammu and Kashmir and the rest of India?

  • The abrogation of Article 370 and Article 35A marks a significant shift in the relationship between Jammu and Kashmir and the rest of India. It signifies a move towards greater integration and uniformity within the Indian legal framework. The region is now governed by the same set of laws that apply to the rest of India, which promotes a sense of national unity.
  • While this change has been met with various reactions, it is essential to understand that it is aimed at fostering a more cohesive and equitable India. It allows citizens from other states to invest in Jammu and Kashmir, promoting economic growth and development. It also eliminates the complexities associated with dual citizenship and conflicting legal frameworks.
  • The abrogation is intended to bring Jammu and Kashmir into the mainstream, making it an integral part of India’s development story. It ensures that the people of Jammu and Kashmir can fully benefit from national schemes and initiatives aimed at improving education, healthcare, infrastructure, and overall quality of life.

What are the implications of the Line of Control (LoC) and the Line of Actual Control (LAC) for the legal status of the regions they demarcate?

  • The Line of Control (LoC) and the Line of Actual Control (LAC) are de facto boundaries that demarcate the regions between India and Pakistan, and India and China, respectively. These lines are a result of ceasefire agreements and military control rather than legally recognized borders.
  • The legal status of these regions remains disputed, as both India and Pakistan claim sovereignty over the entirety of Jammu and Kashmir, and India and China have unresolved border issues. International efforts have been made to resolve these disputes, but they remain unresolved.
  • These border disputes have implications for the people living in these regions, affecting their mobility, access to resources, and political rights. The legal status of these regions is contingent on diplomatic and political negotiations, and any changes would require international consensus.

Real-Life Example: Navigating Legal Challenges in Jammu and Kashmir

To illustrate the complexity of legal challenges in Jammu and Kashmir and the role of legal services, let’s consider a real-life scenario:

Imagine a family in Srinagar facing a property dispute that arose due to the abrogation of Article 370 and the subsequent changes in land laws. The dispute involves issues related to property ownership, land use, and the applicability of new land regulations. The family is uncertain about their rights and is concerned about the potential consequences of the dispute.

In this situation, seeking legal counsel is essential. A law firm specializing in property and land laws in Jammu and Kashmir can provide valuable assistance. Their services may include:

  1. Legal Assessment: The law firm would conduct a thorough review of the family’s case, examining the legal documents, land records, and relevant regulations to determine the current legal status of the property.
  2. Consultation: The family would have the opportunity to consult with legal experts who can explain the implications of the recent legal changes and how they affect the property dispute.
  3. Legal Representation: If necessary, the law firm can represent the family in legal proceedings, such as negotiations with other parties involved in the dispute or in court if a resolution cannot be reached through negotiations.
  4. Guidance on Compliance: The legal experts would guide the family on how to comply with the new land laws and any other legal requirements to ensure they are in accordance with the updated regulations.
  5. Resolution Strategies: The law firm would work with the family to develop strategies for resolving the dispute amicably, which may involve mediation or alternative dispute resolution methods.
  6. Protection of Rights: The legal team would work to protect the family’s legal rights and interests throughout the process, ensuring they are not disadvantaged due to changes in the legal landscape.

Through such legal assistance, the family can navigate the complexities of the evolving legal framework in Jammu and Kashmir and work towards a satisfactory resolution to their property dispute.

Conclusion: Advocate Aid – Navigating the Legal Landscape in Jammu & Kashmir

The legal landscape in Jammu and Kashmir is a dynamic and evolving one, shaped by its history, constitutional changes, and geopolitical complexities. The abrogation of Article 370, the bifurcation into union territories, and the associated legal reforms have brought about significant transformations in the region.

It is crucial for residents

, businesses, and individuals in Jammu and Kashmir to have access to knowledgeable and experienced legal professionals who can guide them through the complexities of this legal landscape. Whether dealing with property disputes, land laws, human rights issues, or any other legal matter, expert legal advice and representation are invaluable.

At Advocate Aid, we offer a team of dedicated legal experts with a deep understanding of Jammu and Kashmir’s legal framework. We are committed to providing top-notch legal services to help you navigate and address your legal concerns effectively. Our comprehensive approach encompasses legal assessment, consultation, representation, and resolution strategies tailored to your specific needs.

If you are facing legal challenges in Jammu and Kashmir or seek legal advice in the region, Advocate Aid is here to assist you. Contact us today to discuss your case and receive the guidance and support you require in this complex legal landscape.

Disclaimer

The Bar Council of India does not permit advertisement or solicitation by advocates in any form or manner. By accessing this website, www.advocatesaid.com, you acknowledge and confirm that you are seeking information relating to Law Offices of Advocate Mushtaq Ahmad Dar of your own accord and that there has been no form of solicitation, advertisement or inducement by our Law Offices or its members. The content of this website is for informational purposes only and should not be interpreted as soliciting or advertisement. No material/information provided on this website should be construed as legal advice. The Law Offices (www.advocatesaid.com) shall not be liable for the consequences of any action taken by relying on the material/information provided on this website. The contents of this website are the intellectual property of Advocate Mushtaq Ahmad Dar.